Like what we do?

 

CCWRO acknowledges that these are difficult times for everyone, especially community groups, non-profits, and families.

Make a Donation

On-Line Application for Welfare

 

On-Line Application for Welfare

Welfare Rights Advocate DSS and other meeting schedule

December 2011 January 2012 February 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

How to Ask for a State Hearing (welfare fair hearing)

 

You can complete the attached fillable pdf form and fax it to 916-651-5210 OR 916-651-6258.

2011 CCWRO Fillable State Hearing Request Form


Translate

English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish
Home
Who we are E-mail

The Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations, Inc. (CCWRO) has been providing advocacy in the public benefits field since the early 1980s. CCWRO is a statewide nonprofit organization that provides back-up services to qualified legal service field programs funded by the Legal Services Trust Fund Commission and pro-bono attorneys referred to CCWRO by such legal services field programs.


CCWRO provides consultation, information, training and representation on issues relating to public benefit programs such as Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) aka CalWORKs/TANF, Refugee Assistance, Medi-Cal, Welfare Employment Programs, Food Stamps, General Assistance, Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI) and SSI.

 

 
CCWRO’s View of Welfare Reform PDF Print E-mail

 

Welfare reform or welfare deform? Historically, most of the so-called “welfare reform” enactments have made life more difficult for impoverished children and their families. 

The latest welfare deform program, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) P.L. 104-193, is the latest attempt at reforming welfare. It imposes 2-year time limits on impoverished families. After two years many impoverished families, who for the most part are single mothers, lose their safety net and are sentenced to becoming homeless and/or foodless in the United States of America.

The anti-family and anti-child message is clear, that working is more important than parenting as women are expected to look for work soon after their babies are born. This means many babies and very young children are housed in day care centers and in the care of strangers instead of their parents.

Welfare officials and politicians continue to tout the propaganda that after TANF, caseloads are going down. The truth is that poverty has risen. With these strict timelines, what happens to that family when they no longer are eligible for aid?  Where do they go?  How do they live? 
  
To make things worse, about 70% of the TANF federal and state-matching money goes to welfare bureaucracies and to balance state budgets. Less than 30% of it goes to “payments to families with children." Before TANF, 80% of the AFDC money went to “payments to families.”  TANF has been a resounding success for everyone, but poor families.

 

 
What Happens to TANF Money PDF Print E-mail

TANF

35% - Goes to Poor Families

65% - Goes to the State and Local Government

Percentage of the Total TANF Funds Expended for

Payments to Families During Federal Fiscal Year 2009


 

  1. ILLINOIS --------------------6%
  2. ARKANSAS ----------------12%
  3. DIST.OF COLUMBIA -----13%
  4. NORTH CAROLINA ------14%
  5. TEXAS -----------------------15%
  6. COLORADO ----------------17%
  7. GEORGIA -------------------18%
  8. IDAHO -----------------------18%
  9. MINNESOTA ---------------18%
  10. WISCONSIN ----------------20%
  11. CONNECTICUT -----------20%
  12. NEW JERSEY --------------20%
  13. MARYLAND -----------------22%
  14. HAWAII -----------------------21%
  15. LOUISIANA -----------------22%
  16. PENNSYLVANIA -----------22%
  17. WASHINGTON -------------22%
  18. FLORIDA ---------------------24%
  19. OKLAHOMA -----------------26%
  20. SOUTH CAROLINA -------26%
  21. MICHIGAN -------------------27%
  22. NEBRASKA -----------------29%
  23. MISSISSIPPI ----------------30%
  24. MASSACHUSETTS -------30%
  25. VIRGINIA --------------------31%
  26. ALABAMA -------------------31%
  27. MISSOURI ------------------33%
  28. OHIO --------------------------33%
  29. INDIANA ----------------------35

 


Source: DHSS Combined Spending of Federal, State Funds With ARRA Fund Expended in FY 2009

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/data/2009/table_f3_2009.html

 
Ask CCWRO PDF Print E-mail
Please fill out the form out completely. Inlcuding detailed information will enable us to answer your question better.

Your first name
Your last name
Email address
Telephone
Telephone :: Start with area code first (sample: 9161234567)
Mobile phone
Mobile phone :: Start with area code first (sample: 9161234567)
Your question
Your question :: Please be specific as possible
Background of the question, if any
Please enter the code